Chemical Free? Safe Cosmetics?
The word "chemicals" seems to emote fear and misunderstanding whenever it is used in the context of a sales pitch in order for a natural and / or organic company to sell their products to the less informed.
Unfortunately, it turns out the representative of a company using this emotive language is the one less informed, or perhaps possesses no actual understanding of true science. Or maybe they do, and mislead intentionally because they can't sell their products based on its' merits, so it is better to market them through scaring the consumer into believing "CHEMICALS" are the enemy to our heath and well being. Selling based on a negative campaign, in my opinion, should be suspect and challenged. And the way to do this, is through a comprehensive education of the science, not selective jargon to yield the best results of a target audience.
This article below describes it best and is written by Dene Godfrey, my guest post today! I have enjoyed many of his articles, but this one in particular drives the point home and makes it very clear the interpretive understanding of exactly why companies work so hard to drive home this scary message and skew science for their (sales) benefit. Thanks Dene for a great article and for making things quite clear.
Chemical Free and 100% Safe
I have previously written about the undesirable existence of various “free from” claims in cosmetics but in this article I would like to concentrate on one very specific “free from” claim, and look at it in a little more depth:
It has been stated many times before that everything is chemical, so it is a ludicrous statement to claim “no chemicals” – who wants to buy a vacuum?
The response, when pressed on this claim is usually – “well I meant synthetic chemicals”. OK – so SAY “free from synthetic chemicals” . . . . . . then check your ingredient list again, just to be sure you are not making a false claim.
However, let’s just ponder for a moment the status of the product of the esterification reaction between the natural alcohol and the natural acid – esterification is a reaction between an alcohol and an acid, resulting in the production of the ester plus water. There is no doubt that the two starting materials are natural; they have been extracted from nature, but what about the ester produced in this process? This SYNTHETIC process! The ester MUST be synthetic – it is the result of a process carried on outside of any biological (i.e. “natural”) mechanism. It does not matter one iota that a self-appointed certification body has arbitrarily determined that the ester thereby produced may be described as “organic” – it is unequivocally a synthetic chemical. Nor does it matter one iota if that particular ester actually exists in nature – it has still been produced synthetically, so it is still a synthetic chemical. OK, it may be acceptable to describe it as “nature-identical”, but synthetic it remains. The most common examples of “nature-identical” substances are the preservatives, sodium benzoate and potassium sorbate. (Not only are these substances synthetic, but also they are manufactured from petrochemical feedstock, so any claim to also be “free from petrochemicals” is also false – they are both great preservatives, though!).
“Organic” does NOT mean “free of synthetic chemicals” any more than it means “safer cosmetics”; and it doesn’t always mean “free from petrochemicals” either! We should all have choices, but false claims lead to wrong choices.
And finally, I suggest that you check the container of any product that claims 
to be free of petrochemicals, especially if it is plastic . . . . .
Category Article Beauty Industry Tales, Makeup Ingredient Facts, Skin Care Ingredient Facts
